GPUDecision

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Comparison

x
GPU to replace
Change

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

16 GB | 41.15 TFLOPS

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
Change

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

8 GB | 8.940 TFLOPS

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Comparison Overview
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded RTX 5000 Mobile Ada...
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada G...
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada...
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada G...

In this review, we will be comparing RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, two GPUs by NVIDIA. RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded was introduced to market in March and was launched in March . Both RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation are members of NVIDIA's Quadro Ada-M (x000A) series of GPUs. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

NVIDIA Quadro Ada-M (x000A) Series History
Model Release Date Fabrication Process Performance
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 5 nm 8.940 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 12.99 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 15.62 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 15.82 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 24.72 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 32.69 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
March 2023 5 nm 41.15 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 41.15 TFLOPS

Here is a brief look at the main features of RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation before getting into our more detailed comparison.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded Key Specs

  • Launched in Mar 21st, 2023
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD103
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 1425 MHz
  • 16 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Key Specs

  • Launched in Mar 21st, 2023
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD107
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 930 MHz
  • 8 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how and compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded over RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Transistors
45,900 million vs 18,900 million Has more transistors
GPU Base Clock
1425 MHz vs 930 MHz 495 MHz faster Base Clock
GPU Boost Clock
2115 MHz vs 1455 MHz 660 MHz faster Boost Clock
Memory Size
16 GB vs 8 GB 8 GB more RAM
Memory Clock
2250 MHz vs 2000 MHz 250 MHz faster Memory Clock
Memory Bus Bits
256 bit vs 128 bit More Memory Bits
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s vs 256.0 GB/s Wider Memory Bandwith
Render Config Shading Units (RCSU)
9728 vs 3072 Better Visual Effects Performance
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)
304 vs 96 Better Texture Performance
Ray Tracing (RT) Cores
112 vs 48 Better 3D Performance
Raster Operations Pipeline (ROP)
76 vs 24 Better Optical Effects Performance
L2 Cache Memory
64 MB vs 12 MB More Cache Memory
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s vs 69.84 GPixel/s Better Pixel Rate
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s vs 139.7 GTexel/s Better Texture Performance
Performance
41.15 TFLOPS vs 8.940 TFLOPS More processing power
Tensor Cores
304 vs 96 Better AI field performance
Streaming Multiprocessor (RM) Count
76 vs 24 Better in parallel computing performance
Reasons to choose RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation over RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
35 W vs 120 W Requires less cooling

Common Strengths of RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Process Size
5 nm vs 5 nm Latest Process Technology
Memory Size
16 GB vs 8 GB Both GPUs have more than 4 GB Memory
Memory Clock Speeds
2250 MHz vs 2000 MHz Over Average Memory Clock Speeds
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x16 Both have latest Bus type
Common Weaknesses of RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Launch Dates
2023-03-21 vs 2023-03-21 GPUs are older than 1 year

PERFORMANCE

FLOPS

FLOPS is commonly used for measuring GPU performance in 32-bit floating-point operations, essential for scientific computing, data analysis, machine learning, and graphics tasks. A higher value indicates faster and more complex calculations, vital for scientific research, simulations, and high-performance computing.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded has nearly top performance with 41.15 TFLOPS in its class.

FLOPS Comparison (TFLOPS)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
Min
Average
Max
GPU BASE and BOOST CLOCK SPEED

The GPU base clock speed is the standard operating frequency, while the boost clock speed represents the maximum dynamic frequency the GPU can achieve under increased demand. These clock speeds influence the GPU's performance, with the base clock setting the standard level and the boost clock allowing for extra power when needed, enhancing overall responsiveness in demanding applications like gaming.

Base Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Boost Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
MEMORY SIZE and MEMORY CLOCK SPEED

GPU memory size refers to the storage capacity for visual data. This capacity is crucial for tasks like gaming and graphic-intensive work. Memory clock speed affects how quickly the GPU's memory operates. Faster memory speed improves performance, especially in high-resolution gaming. Balancing memory size and clock speed is vital for a GPU's graphics handling capabilities..

The base clock speed of the RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is below average, you may evaluate it further for your decision.
Memory Size Comparison (GB)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Memory Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
GPU THERMAL DESIGN POWER (TDP)

GPU TDP, or Thermal Design Power, quantifies the maximum heat a graphics processing unit (GPU) generates under load. It's vital for selecting appropriate cooling solutions and power efficiency. Higher TDP GPUs require better cooling, while lower TDP GPUs are more power-efficient. Understanding TDP aids in choosing the right GPU for a system.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded has nearly highest TDP with 120.00 W in its class.

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation better than average with 35.00 W TDP in its class.

TDP Comparison (Watts)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation: Specs Comparison Table

In this section, we will be comparing the specifications the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and the RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation.

Processor
Model RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Generation Quadro Ada-M (x000A) Quadro Ada-M (x000A)
Predecessor Quadro Ampere-M Quadro Ampere-M
Release Date 2023-03-21 2023-03-21
Brand NVIDIA NVIDIA
GPU Name AD103 AD107
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Foundry TSMC TSMC
Process Size 5 nm 5 nm
Number of Transistors 45,900 million 18,900 million
Density of Transistors 121.1M / mm² 118.9M / mm²
Die Size 379 mm² 159 mm²
GPU Base Clock Speed 1425 MHz 930 MHz
GPU Clock Speed 2115 MHz 1455 MHz
Memory
Memory 16 GB 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2250 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory Bus 256 bit 128 bit
Memory Bandwith 576.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s
Bus Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Render Configurations
Shading Units 9728 3072
TMUs 304 96
ROPs 112 48
RT Cores 76 24
SM Count 76 24
Tensor Cores 304 96
L1 Cache 128 KB (per SM) 128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache 64 MB 12 MB
Performance and Features
Pixel Rate 236.9 GPixel/s 69.84 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 643.0 GTexel/s 139.7 GTexel/s
DirectX 12 Ultimate 12 Ultimate
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
FP16 Half 41.15 TFLOPS (1:1) 8.940 TFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 41.15 TFLOPS 8.940 TFLOPS
FP64 double 643.0 GFLOPS (1:64) 139.7 GFLOPS (1:64)
CUDA 8.9 8.9
OTHER
Slot Width IGP IGP
TDP 120 W 35 W
Outputs Portable Device Dependent Portable Device Dependent
Power Connectors None None
Latest Integrated GPUs
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
January 2023 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP
September 2022 | 5 nm
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
September 2022 | 10 nm
UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
January 2022 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
March 2021 | 14 nm+++
Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
January 2021 | 7 nm

Latest Mobile GPUs
Arc A530M
Arc A530M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc A570M
Arc A570M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M
June 2023 | 6 nm
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm

Latest Non-Mobile GPUs
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
July 2023 | 5 nm
Copyright © 2023 by GPUDecision
Privacy About CameraDecision SpeakerDecision Laptopdecision

Report a Correction