GPUDecision

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation Comparison

x
GPU to replace
Change

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

32 GB | 65.28 TFLOPS

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

48 GB | 91.06 TFLOPS

CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Comparison Overview
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generat...
See at AMAZON
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generat...
See at AMAZON
RTX 5000 Ada Generat...
See at AMAZON
RTX 6000 Ada Generat...
See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation, two GPUs by NVIDIA. RTX 5000 Ada Generation was introduced to market in August and was launched in December . There is only 8 months difference between RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation are members of NVIDIA's Quadro Ada (x000A) series of GPUs. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

NVIDIA Quadro Ada (x000A) Series History
Model Release Date Fabrication Process Performance
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
  Compare
August 2023 5 nm 26.73 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 19.17 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
  Compare
August 2023 5 nm 39.63 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 5 nm 65.28 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
December 2022 5 nm 91.06 TFLOPS

Here is a brief look at the main features of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation before getting into our more detailed comparison.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Key Specs

  • Launched in Aug 9th, 2023
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD102
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 1155 MHz
  • 32 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

RTX 6000 Ada Generation Key Specs

  • Launched in Dec 3rd, 2022
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD102
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 915 MHz
  • 48 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how and compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose RTX 5000 Ada Generation over RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GPU Base Clock
1155 MHz vs 915 MHz 240 MHz faster Base Clock
GPU Boost Clock
2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz 45 MHz faster Boost Clock
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W vs 300 W Requires less cooling
Reasons to choose RTX 6000 Ada Generation over RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Memory Size
48 GB vs 32 GB 16 GB more RAM
Memory Clock
2500 MHz vs 2250 MHz 250 MHz faster Memory Clock
Memory Bus Bits
384 bit vs 256 bit More Memory Bits
Memory Bandwidth
960.0 GB/s vs 576.0 GB/s Wider Memory Bandwith
Render Config Shading Units (RCSU)
18176 vs 12800 Better Visual Effects Performance
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)
568 vs 400 Better Texture Performance
Ray Tracing (RT) Cores
192 vs 176 Better 3D Performance
Raster Operations Pipeline (ROP)
142 vs 100 Better Optical Effects Performance
L2 Cache Memory
96 MB vs 72 MB More Cache Memory
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s vs 448.8 GPixel/s Better Pixel Rate
Texture Rate
1,423 GTexel/s vs 1,020 GTexel/s Better Texture Performance
Performance
91.06 TFLOPS vs 65.28 TFLOPS More processing power
Tensor Cores
568 vs 400 Better AI field performance
Streaming Multiprocessor (RM) Count
142 vs 100 Better in parallel computing performance

Common Strengths of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Process Size
5 nm vs 5 nm Latest Process Technology
Memory Size
32 GB vs 48 GB Both GPUs have more than 4 GB Memory
Memory Clock Speeds
2250 MHz vs 2500 MHz Over Average Memory Clock Speeds
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x16 Both have latest Bus type
Common Weaknesses of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Launch Dates
2023-08-09 vs 2022-12-03 GPUs are older than 1 year
GPU Clock Speeds
1155 MHz vs 915 MHz Below the average in this year
TDP
250 W vs 300 W May face thermal performance problems

PERFORMANCE

FLOPS

FLOPS is commonly used for measuring GPU performance in 32-bit floating-point operations, essential for scientific computing, data analysis, machine learning, and graphics tasks. A higher value indicates faster and more complex calculations, vital for scientific research, simulations, and high-performance computing.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation performs above average with 65.28 TFLOPS provides more performance overall GPU's in its class.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has nearly top performance with 91.06 TFLOPS in its class.

FLOPS Comparison (TFLOPS)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
GPU BASE and BOOST CLOCK SPEED

The GPU base clock speed is the standard operating frequency, while the boost clock speed represents the maximum dynamic frequency the GPU can achieve under increased demand. These clock speeds influence the GPU's performance, with the base clock setting the standard level and the boost clock allowing for extra power when needed, enhancing overall responsiveness in demanding applications like gaming.

The base clock speed of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is below average, which could be a sign of lower performance potential.
Base Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Boost Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
MEMORY SIZE and MEMORY CLOCK SPEED

GPU memory size refers to the storage capacity for visual data. This capacity is crucial for tasks like gaming and graphic-intensive work. Memory clock speed affects how quickly the GPU's memory operates. Faster memory speed improves performance, especially in high-resolution gaming. Balancing memory size and clock speed is vital for a GPU's graphics handling capabilities..

Memory Size Comparison (GB)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Memory Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
GPU THERMAL DESIGN POWER (TDP)

GPU TDP, or Thermal Design Power, quantifies the maximum heat a graphics processing unit (GPU) generates under load. It's vital for selecting appropriate cooling solutions and power efficiency. Higher TDP GPUs require better cooling, while lower TDP GPUs are more power-efficient. Understanding TDP aids in choosing the right GPU for a system.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation better than average with 250.00 W TDP in its class.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than average with 300.00 W TDP in its class.

TDP Comparison (Watts)

non-mobile type GPUs

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Specs Comparison Table

In this section, we will be comparing the specifications the RTX 5000 Ada Generation and the RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Processor
Model RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Generation Quadro Ada (x000A) Quadro Ada (x000A)
Predecessor Quadro Ampere Quadro Ampere
Release Date 2023-08-09 2022-12-03
Brand NVIDIA NVIDIA
GPU Name AD102 AD102
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Foundry TSMC TSMC
Process Size 5 nm 5 nm
Number of Transistors 76,300 million 76,300 million
Density of Transistors 125.3M / mm² 125.3M / mm²
Die Size 609 mm² 609 mm²
GPU Variant AD102 AD102
GPU Base Clock Speed 1155 MHz 915 MHz
GPU Clock Speed 2550 MHz 2505 MHz
Memory
Memory 32 GB 48 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2250 MHz 2500 MHz
Memory Bus 256 bit 384 bit
Memory Bandwith 576.0 GB/s 960.0 GB/s
Bus Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Render Configurations
Shading Units 12800 18176
TMUs 400 568
ROPs 176 192
RT Cores 100 142
SM Count 100 142
Tensor Cores 400 568
L1 Cache 128 KB (per SM) 128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache 72 MB 96 MB
Performance and Features
Pixel Rate 448.8 GPixel/s 481.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 1,020 GTexel/s 1,423 GTexel/s
DirectX 12 Ultimate 12 Ultimate
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
FP16 Half 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1) 91.06 TFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 65.28 TFLOPS 91.06 TFLOPS
FP64 double 1,020 GFLOPS (1:64) 1,423 GFLOPS (1:64)
CUDA 8.9 8.9
OTHER
Length 267 mm 10.5 inches 267 mm 10.5 inches
Width 112 mm 4.4 inches 112 mm 4.4 inches
Suggested Power Supply 600 W 700 W
Slot Width Dual-slot Dual-slot
TDP 250 W 300 W
Outputs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Power Connectors 1x 16-pin 1x 16-pin
Latest Integrated GPUs
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
January 2023 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP
September 2022 | 5 nm
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
September 2022 | 10 nm
UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
January 2022 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
March 2021 | 14 nm+++
Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
January 2021 | 7 nm

Latest Mobile GPUs
Arc A530M
Arc A530M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc A570M
Arc A570M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M
June 2023 | 6 nm
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm

Latest Non-Mobile GPUs
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
July 2023 | 5 nm
Copyright © 2023 by GPUDecision
Privacy About CameraDecision SpeakerDecision Laptopdecision

Report a Correction