GPUDecision

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Comparison

x
GPU to replace
Change

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

8 GB | 12.99 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Change

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

8 GB | 8.940 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Comparison Overview
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 2000 Mobile Ada...
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada G...
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada...
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada G...

In this review, we will be comparing RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, two GPUs by NVIDIA. RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation was introduced to market in March and was launched in March . Both RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation are members of NVIDIA's Quadro Ada-M (x000A) series of GPUs. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

NVIDIA Quadro Ada-M (x000A) Series History
Model Release Date Fabrication Process Performance
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 5 nm 8.940 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 5 nm 12.99 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 15.62 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 15.82 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 24.72 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 32.69 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 41.15 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
  Compare
March 2023 5 nm 41.15 TFLOPS

Here is a brief look at the main features of RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation before getting into our more detailed comparison.

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Key Specs

  • Launched in Mar 21st, 2023
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD107
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 1635 MHz
  • 8 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation Key Specs

  • Launched in Mar 21st, 2023
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: AD107
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 930 MHz
  • 8 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how and compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation over RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
GPU Base Clock
1635 MHz vs 930 MHz 705 MHz faster Base Clock
GPU Boost Clock
2115 MHz vs 1455 MHz 660 MHz faster Boost Clock
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s vs 69.84 GPixel/s Better Pixel Rate
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s vs 139.7 GTexel/s Better Texture Performance
Performance
12.99 TFLOPS vs 8.940 TFLOPS More processing power
Reasons to choose RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation over RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
35 W vs 50 W Requires less cooling

Common Strengths of RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Process Size
5 nm vs 5 nm Latest Process Technology
Memory Size
8 GB vs 8 GB Both GPUs have more than 4 GB Memory
Memory Clock Speeds
2000 MHz vs 2000 MHz Over Average Memory Clock Speeds
TDP
50 W vs 35 W Good Thermal Performance
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x16 Both have latest Bus type
Common Weaknesses of RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Launch Dates
2023-03-21 vs 2023-03-21 GPUs are older than 1 year

PERFORMANCE

FLOPS

FLOPS is commonly used for measuring GPU performance in 32-bit floating-point operations, essential for scientific computing, data analysis, machine learning, and graphics tasks. A higher value indicates faster and more complex calculations, vital for scientific research, simulations, and high-performance computing.

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation performs above average with 12.99 TFLOPS provides more performance overall GPU's in its class.

FLOPS Comparison (TFLOPS)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
GPU BASE and BOOST CLOCK SPEED

The GPU base clock speed is the standard operating frequency, while the boost clock speed represents the maximum dynamic frequency the GPU can achieve under increased demand. These clock speeds influence the GPU's performance, with the base clock setting the standard level and the boost clock allowing for extra power when needed, enhancing overall responsiveness in demanding applications like gaming.

Base Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Boost Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
MEMORY SIZE and MEMORY CLOCK SPEED

GPU memory size refers to the storage capacity for visual data. This capacity is crucial for tasks like gaming and graphic-intensive work. Memory clock speed affects how quickly the GPU's memory operates. Faster memory speed improves performance, especially in high-resolution gaming. Balancing memory size and clock speed is vital for a GPU's graphics handling capabilities..

The base clock speed of the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is below average, which could be a sign of lower performance potential. The base clock speed of the RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is below average, you may evaluate it further for your decision.
Memory Size Comparison (GB)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
Memory Clock Comparison (MHz)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
GPU THERMAL DESIGN POWER (TDP)

GPU TDP, or Thermal Design Power, quantifies the maximum heat a graphics processing unit (GPU) generates under load. It's vital for selecting appropriate cooling solutions and power efficiency. Higher TDP GPUs require better cooling, while lower TDP GPUs are more power-efficient. Understanding TDP aids in choosing the right GPU for a system.

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation better than average with 50.00 W TDP in its class.

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation better than average with 35.00 W TDP in its class.

TDP Comparison (Watts)

mobile type GPUs

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Min
Average
Max
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation: Specs Comparison Table

In this section, we will be comparing the specifications the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and the RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation.

Processor
Model RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Generation Quadro Ada-M (x000A) Quadro Ada-M (x000A)
Predecessor Quadro Ampere-M Quadro Ampere-M
Release Date 2023-03-21 2023-03-21
Brand NVIDIA NVIDIA
GPU Name AD107 AD107
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Foundry TSMC TSMC
Process Size 5 nm 5 nm
Number of Transistors 18,900 million 18,900 million
Density of Transistors 118.9M / mm² 118.9M / mm²
Die Size 159 mm² 159 mm²
GPU Base Clock Speed 1635 MHz 930 MHz
GPU Clock Speed 2115 MHz 1455 MHz
Memory
Memory 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory Bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory Bandwith 256.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s
Bus Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Render Configurations
Shading Units 3072 3072
TMUs 96 96
ROPs 48 48
RT Cores 24 24
SM Count 24 24
Tensor Cores 96 96
L1 Cache 128 KB (per SM) 128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache 12 MB 12 MB
Performance and Features
Pixel Rate 101.5 GPixel/s 69.84 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 203.0 GTexel/s 139.7 GTexel/s
DirectX 12 Ultimate 12 Ultimate
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
FP16 Half 12.99 TFLOPS (1:1) 8.940 TFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 12.99 TFLOPS 8.940 TFLOPS
FP64 double 203.0 GFLOPS (1:64) 139.7 GFLOPS (1:64)
CUDA 8.9 8.9
OTHER
Slot Width IGP IGP
TDP 50 W 35 W
Outputs Portable Device Dependent Portable Device Dependent
Power Connectors None None
Latest Integrated GPUs
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
January 2023 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP
September 2022 | 5 nm
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
September 2022 | 10 nm
UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
January 2022 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
March 2021 | 14 nm+++
Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
January 2021 | 7 nm

Latest Mobile GPUs
Arc A530M
Arc A530M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc A570M
Arc A570M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M
June 2023 | 6 nm
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm

Latest Non-Mobile GPUs
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
July 2023 | 5 nm
Copyright © 2023 by GPUDecision
Privacy About CameraDecision SpeakerDecision Laptopdecision

Report a Correction