GPUDecision

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Comparison

x
GPU to replace
Change

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

48 GB | 14.93 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Quadro RTX 5000

16 GB | 11.15 TFLOPS

CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Quadro RTX 5000 Comparison Overview
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Pass...
See at AMAZON
Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
See at AMAZON
Quadro RTX 8000 Pass...
See at AMAZON
Quadro RTX 5000
See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000, two GPUs by NVIDIA. Quadro RTX 8000 Passive was introduced to market in August and was launched in August . Both Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000 were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000 are members of NVIDIA's Quadro Turing (Tx000) series of GPUs. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

NVIDIA Quadro Turing (Tx000) Series History
Model Release Date Fabrication Process Performance
T1000
  Compare
May 2021 12 nm 2.500 TFLOPS
T1000 8 GB
  Compare
May 2021 12 nm 2.500 TFLOPS
T400
  Compare
May 2021 12 nm 1,094 GFLOPS
T400 4 GB
  Compare
May 2021 12 nm 1,094 GFLOPS
T600
  Compare
April 2021 12 nm 1.709 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
  Compare
November 2018 12 nm 7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
August 2018 12 nm 11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000
  Compare
August 2018 12 nm 16.31 TFLOPS

Here is a brief look at the main features of Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Key Specs

  • Launched in Aug 13th, 2018
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: TU102
  • Tecnology: 12 nm
  • Clock: 1230 MHz
  • 48 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 1625 MHz 13 Gbps effective

Quadro RTX 5000 Key Specs

  • Launched in Aug 13th, 2018
  • Brand: NVIDIA
  • GPU: TU104
  • Tecnology: 12 nm
  • Clock: 1620 MHz
  • 16 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how and compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Quadro RTX 8000 Passive over Quadro RTX 5000
Transistors
18,600 million vs 13,600 million Has more transistors
Memory Size
48 GB vs 16 GB 32 GB more RAM
Memory Bus Bits
384 bit vs 256 bit More Memory Bits
Memory Bandwidth
624.0 GB/s vs 448.0 GB/s Wider Memory Bandwith
Render Config Shading Units (RCSU)
4608 vs 3072 Better Visual Effects Performance
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)
288 vs 192 Better Texture Performance
Ray Tracing (RT) Cores
96 vs 64 Better 3D Performance
Raster Operations Pipeline (ROP)
72 vs 48 Better Optical Effects Performance
L2 Cache Memory
6 MB vs 4 MB More Cache Memory
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s vs 116.2 GPixel/s Better Pixel Rate
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s vs 348.5 GTexel/s Better Texture Performance
Performance
14.93 TFLOPS vs 11.15 TFLOPS More processing power
Tensor Cores
576 vs 384 Better AI field performance
Streaming Multiprocessor (RM) Count
72 vs 48 Better in parallel computing performance
Reasons to choose Quadro RTX 5000 over Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
GPU Base Clock
1620 MHz vs 1230 MHz 390 MHz faster Base Clock
GPU Boost Clock
1815 MHz vs 1620 MHz 195 MHz faster Boost Clock
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
230 W vs 260 W Requires less cooling
Memory Clock
1750 MHz vs 1625 MHz 125 MHz faster Memory Clock

Common Strengths of Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000
Memory Size
48 GB vs 16 GB Both GPUs have more than 4 GB Memory
Memory Clock Speeds
1625 MHz vs 1750 MHz Over Average Memory Clock Speeds
Common Weaknesses of Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Quadro RTX 5000
Launch Dates
2018-08-13 vs 2018-08-13 GPUs are older than 1 year
Process Size
12 nm vs 12 nm Process thickness is not the latest
TDP
260 W vs 230 W May face thermal performance problems

PERFORMANCE

FLOPS

FLOPS is commonly used for measuring GPU performance in 32-bit floating-point operations, essential for scientific computing, data analysis, machine learning, and graphics tasks. A higher value indicates faster and more complex calculations, vital for scientific research, simulations, and high-performance computing.

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive has nearly top performance with 14.93 TFLOPS in its class.

Quadro RTX 5000 performs above average with 11.15 TFLOPS provides more performance overall GPU's in its class.

FLOPS Comparison (TFLOPS)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
GPU BASE and BOOST CLOCK SPEED

The GPU base clock speed is the standard operating frequency, while the boost clock speed represents the maximum dynamic frequency the GPU can achieve under increased demand. These clock speeds influence the GPU's performance, with the base clock setting the standard level and the boost clock allowing for extra power when needed, enhancing overall responsiveness in demanding applications like gaming.

The base clock speed of the Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is below average, which could be a sign of lower performance potential.
Base Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
Boost Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
MEMORY SIZE and MEMORY CLOCK SPEED

GPU memory size refers to the storage capacity for visual data. This capacity is crucial for tasks like gaming and graphic-intensive work. Memory clock speed affects how quickly the GPU's memory operates. Faster memory speed improves performance, especially in high-resolution gaming. Balancing memory size and clock speed is vital for a GPU's graphics handling capabilities..

Memory Size Comparison (GB)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
Memory Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
GPU THERMAL DESIGN POWER (TDP)

GPU TDP, or Thermal Design Power, quantifies the maximum heat a graphics processing unit (GPU) generates under load. It's vital for selecting appropriate cooling solutions and power efficiency. Higher TDP GPUs require better cooling, while lower TDP GPUs are more power-efficient. Understanding TDP aids in choosing the right GPU for a system.

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive has nearly highest TDP with 260.00 W in its class.

Quadro RTX 5000 is above average with 230.00 W resulting poor TDP performance overall GPU's in its class.

TDP Comparison (Watts)

non-mobile type GPUs

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 5000
Min
Average
Max
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Quadro RTX 5000: Specs Comparison Table

In this section, we will be comparing the specifications the Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and the Quadro RTX 5000.

Processor
Model Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 5000
Generation Quadro Turing (Tx000) Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Successor Quadro Ampere Quadro Ampere
Predecessor Quadro Volta Quadro Volta
Release Date 2018-08-13 2018-08-13
Brand NVIDIA NVIDIA
GPU Name TU102 TU104
Architecture Turing Turing
Foundry TSMC TSMC
Process Size 12 nm 12 nm
Number of Transistors 18,600 million 13,600 million
Density of Transistors 24.7M / mm² 25.0M / mm²
Die Size 754 mm² 545 mm²
GPU Variant TU102-875-A1 TU104-875-A1
GPU Base Clock Speed 1230 MHz 1620 MHz
GPU Clock Speed 1620 MHz 1815 MHz
Memory
Memory 48 GB 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1625 MHz 1750 MHz
Memory Bus 384 bit 256 bit
Memory Bandwith 624.0 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
Bus Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Render Configurations
Shading Units 4608 3072
TMUs 288 192
ROPs 96 64
RT Cores 72 48
SM Count 72 48
Tensor Cores 576 384
L1 Cache 64 KB (per SM) 64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache 6 MB 4 MB
Performance and Features
Pixel Rate 155.5 GPixel/s 116.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 466.6 GTexel/s 348.5 GTexel/s
DirectX 12 Ultimate 12 Ultimate
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
FP16 Half 29.86 TFLOPS (2:1) 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 14.93 TFLOPS 11.15 TFLOPS
FP64 double 466.6 GFLOPS (1:32) 348.5 GFLOPS (1:32)
CUDA 7.5 7.5
OTHER
Length 267 mm 10.5 inches 267 mm 10.5 inches
Width 111 mm 4.4 inches 111 mm 4.4 inches
Suggested Power Supply 600 W 550 W
Slot Width Dual-slot Dual-slot
TDP 260 W 230 W
Outputs No outputs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Latest Integrated GPUs
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
January 2023 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP
September 2022 | 5 nm
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
September 2022 | 10 nm
UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
January 2022 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
March 2021 | 14 nm+++
Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
January 2021 | 7 nm

Latest Mobile GPUs
Arc A530M
Arc A530M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc A570M
Arc A570M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M
June 2023 | 6 nm
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm

Latest Non-Mobile GPUs
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
July 2023 | 5 nm
Copyright © 2023 by GPUDecision
Privacy About CameraDecision SpeakerDecision Laptopdecision

Report a Correction