GPUDecision

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600 Comparison

x
GPU to replace
Change

Radeon PRO W7900

48 GB | 61.32 TFLOPS

Radeon PRO W7900
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Radeon PRO W7600

8 GB | 19.99 TFLOPS

CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Radeon PRO W7900 vs Radeon PRO W7600 Comparison Overview
Radeon PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
See at AMAZON
Radeon PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
See at AMAZON
Radeon PRO W7900
See at AMAZON
Radeon PRO W7600
See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600, two GPUs by AMD. Radeon PRO W7900 was introduced to market in April and was launched in August . There is only 4 months difference between Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600 are members of AMD's Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) series of GPUs. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

AMD Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) Series History
Model Release Date Fabrication Process Performance
Radeon PRO W7500
  Compare
August 2023 6 nm 12.19 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 6 nm 19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
  Compare
April 2023 5 nm 44.78 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900
April 2023 5 nm 61.32 TFLOPS

Here is a brief look at the main features of Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Radeon PRO W7900 Key Specs

  • Launched in Apr 13th, 2023
  • Brand: AMD
  • GPU: Navi 31
  • Tecnology: 5 nm
  • Clock: 1855 MHz
  • 48 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

Radeon PRO W7600 Key Specs

  • Launched in Aug 3rd, 2023
  • Brand: AMD
  • GPU: Navi 33
  • Tecnology: 6 nm
  • Clock: 1720 MHz
  • 8 GB Ram
  • Mem. Clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how and compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Radeon PRO W7900 over Radeon PRO W7600
Tecnology
5 nm vs 6 nm More transistors in the same volume
Transistors
57,700 million vs 13,300 million Has more transistors
GPU Base Clock
1855 MHz vs 1720 MHz 135 MHz faster Base Clock
GPU Boost Clock
2495 MHz vs 2440 MHz 55 MHz faster Boost Clock
Memory Size
48 GB vs 8 GB 40 GB more RAM
Memory Bus Bits
384 bit vs 128 bit More Memory Bits
Memory Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s Wider Memory Bandwith
Render Config Shading Units (RCSU)
6144 vs 2048 Better Visual Effects Performance
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)
384 vs 128 Better Texture Performance
Ray Tracing (RT) Cores
192 vs 64 Better 3D Performance
Raster Operations Pipeline (ROP)
96 vs 32 Better Optical Effects Performance
L0 Cache Memory
64 KB per WGP vs 32 KB per WGP More Cache Memory
L1 Cache Memory
256 KB per Array vs 128 KB per Array More Cache Memory
L2 Cache Memory
6 MB vs 2 MB More Cache Memory
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s vs 156.2 GPixel/s Better Pixel Rate
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s Better Texture Performance
Performance
61.32 TFLOPS vs 19.99 TFLOPS More processing power
Reasons to choose Radeon PRO W7600 over Radeon PRO W7900
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 W vs 295 W Requires less cooling

Common Strengths of Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600
GPU Clock Speeds
1855 MHz vs 1720 MHz Over Average
Memory Size
48 GB vs 8 GB Both GPUs have more than 4 GB Memory
Memory Clock Speeds
2250 MHz vs 2250 MHz Over Average Memory Clock Speeds
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x8 Both have latest Bus type
Common Weaknesses of Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7600
Launch Dates
2023-04-13 vs 2023-08-03 GPUs are older than 1 year
TDP
295 W vs 130 W May face thermal performance problems

PERFORMANCE

FLOPS

FLOPS is commonly used for measuring GPU performance in 32-bit floating-point operations, essential for scientific computing, data analysis, machine learning, and graphics tasks. A higher value indicates faster and more complex calculations, vital for scientific research, simulations, and high-performance computing.

Radeon PRO W7900 performs above average with 61.32 TFLOPS provides more performance overall GPU's in its class.

FLOPS Comparison (TFLOPS)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Min
Average
Max
GPU BASE and BOOST CLOCK SPEED

The GPU base clock speed is the standard operating frequency, while the boost clock speed represents the maximum dynamic frequency the GPU can achieve under increased demand. These clock speeds influence the GPU's performance, with the base clock setting the standard level and the boost clock allowing for extra power when needed, enhancing overall responsiveness in demanding applications like gaming.

Base Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7600
Min
Average
Max
Boost Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7600
Min
Average
Max
MEMORY SIZE and MEMORY CLOCK SPEED

GPU memory size refers to the storage capacity for visual data. This capacity is crucial for tasks like gaming and graphic-intensive work. Memory clock speed affects how quickly the GPU's memory operates. Faster memory speed improves performance, especially in high-resolution gaming. Balancing memory size and clock speed is vital for a GPU's graphics handling capabilities..

The base clock speed of the Radeon PRO W7600 is below average, you may evaluate it further for your decision.
Memory Size Comparison (GB)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7600
Min
Average
Max
Memory Clock Comparison (MHz)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7600
Min
Average
Max
GPU THERMAL DESIGN POWER (TDP)

GPU TDP, or Thermal Design Power, quantifies the maximum heat a graphics processing unit (GPU) generates under load. It's vital for selecting appropriate cooling solutions and power efficiency. Higher TDP GPUs require better cooling, while lower TDP GPUs are more power-efficient. Understanding TDP aids in choosing the right GPU for a system.

Radeon PRO W7900 better than average with 295.00 W TDP in its class.

Radeon PRO W7600 better than average with 130.00 W TDP in its class.

TDP Comparison (Watts)

non-mobile type GPUs

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7600
Min
Average
Max
Radeon PRO W7900 vs Radeon PRO W7600: Specs Comparison Table

In this section, we will be comparing the specifications the Radeon PRO W7900 and the Radeon PRO W7600.

Processor
Model Radeon PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7600
Generation Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Release Date 2023-04-13 2023-08-03
Brand AMD AMD
GPU Name Navi 31 Navi 33
Architecture RDNA 3.0 RDNA 3.0
Foundry TSMC TSMC
Process Size 5 nm 6 nm
Number of Transistors 57,700 million 13,300 million
Density of Transistors 109.1M / mm² 65.2M / mm²
Die Size 529 mm² 204 mm²
Package MCM Monolithic
GPU Variant Navi 31 Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Base Clock Speed 1855 MHz 1720 MHz
GPU Clock Speed 2495 MHz 2440 MHz
Memory
Memory 48 GB 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2250 MHz 2250 MHz
Memory Bus 384 bit 128 bit
Memory Bandwith 864.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Bus Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
Render Configurations
Shading Units 6144 2048
TMUs 384 128
ROPs 192 64
Config Units 96 32
RT Cores 96 32
L0 Cache 64 KB per WGP 32 KB per WGP
L1 Cache 256 KB per Array 128 KB per Array
L2 Cache 6 MB 2 MB
L3 Cache 96 MB 32 MB
Performance and Features
Pixel Rate 479.0 GPixel/s 156.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 958.1 GTexel/s 312.3 GTexel/s
DirectX 12 Ultimate 12 Ultimate
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.2 2.2
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
FP16 Half 122.6 TFLOPS (2:1) 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 61.32 TFLOPS 19.99 TFLOPS
FP64 double 1.916 TFLOPS (1:32) 624.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
OTHER
Length 280 mm 11 inches 241 mm 9.5 inches
Width 110 mm 4.3 inches 115 mm 4.5 inches
Suggested Power Supply 600 W 300 W
Slot Width Triple-slot Single-slot
TDP 295 W 130 W
Outputs 3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 4x DisplayPort 2.1
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin
Latest Integrated GPUs
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
January 2023 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP
September 2022 | 5 nm
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
September 2022 | 10 nm
UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
January 2022 | 10 nm
Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
April 2021 | 7 nm
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
March 2021 | 14 nm+++
Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
January 2021 | 7 nm

Latest Mobile GPUs
Arc A530M
Arc A530M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc A570M
Arc A570M
August 2023 | 6 nm
Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M
June 2023 | 6 nm
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
March 2023 | 5 nm

Latest Non-Mobile GPUs
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
August 2023 | 5 nm
Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
August 2023 | 6 nm
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
July 2023 | 5 nm
Copyright © 2023 by GPUDecision
Privacy About CameraDecision SpeakerDecision Laptopdecision

Report a Correction